Username:  Password:
Forgot your username or password?        
     
Home Product Tour FAQ Links Forum Pricing Contact Us Buy Now         
MySF Forums
Home       Calendar
        



Financial reporting Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 19/06/2005 11:53:54 AM
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/06/2007 7:56:24 PM
Posts: 0, Visits: 0
Please look into reclassifying your P&L and BS into the format recommended by AAS25 and its recent Exposure Draft.This should entail only recalssifying and renaming the P/L as Statement of Changes in Net Assets and the BS as Statement on Net Assets. All the necesary info is there.

It would also be great if you could introduce an Income Tax reconciliation between Primas Facie @ 15% and the IT expense in the P/L ( Statement of Changes in Net Assets.
The reports will then comply and not have to be restated.

Thank you
Post #3154
Posted 7/06/2007 9:45:19 PM
MySF Administrator

MySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF Administrator

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:32:15 PM
Posts: 133, Visits: 636
We will look into the changes you suggest.

The new exposure draft does include the statement

4.3.1 A number of superannuation funds may not meet the definition of a reporting entity and therefore may choose to prepare special purpose financial reports. Such funds would typically include Self Managed Superannuation Funds which are supervised by the Australian Taxation Office and small superannuation funds regulated by APRA.


Also we expect that in many cases SMSFs are operating on a cash basis rather than a full accrual basis as is required under the following section

4.2.3 This Standard requires that general purpose financial reports of superannuation funds are prepared in accordance with the accrual basis of accounting and establishes financial reporting requirements which must be dealt with in those reports which will enhance the relevance and reliability, and therefore usefulness, of those reports.

Regards

MySF
Post #3155
Posted 7/06/2007 9:45:19 PM
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/06/2007 7:56:24 PM
Posts: 0, Visits: 0
I agree that SMSF's would probably want to minimise reporting and account on a cash basis. However at the back of EDAAS25 you will also see a Special Purpose report which is mostly in line with the layout in the Net AssetMovement/Position reports. I don't see any problem if they are also on a cash basis.
Perhaps you can look into a report called AAS25 Reporting and just reclassify the accounts and balances to their format.
Post #3156
Posted 7/06/2007 9:45:19 PM
MySF Administrator

MySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF Administrator

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:32:15 PM
Posts: 133, Visits: 636
We will take your thoughts on board and see if we can satisfy the requirement.

Thanks for the suggestion

Regards
Post #3157
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »



All times are GMT -6:00, Time now is 2:49am

Powered by InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2010
Execution: 0.141. 10 queries. Compression Disabled.